I am serious. Yesterday, something happened in the class that triggered this thought. Suddenly the electricity went off and this professor went blank. It was like his power supply was cut off and he was just standing there looking at the board blankly. Then suddenly he said “Where was I?” (Maybe used his backup power!). And his processor hung again. Finally when electricity was restored, he was back on track but he repeated half the stuff…maybe he didnt hav time to save the backup. (He claimed that he suddenly went blank bcoz he was distracted when the lights went off, but that must be std defense mechanism to hide the identity). I m not lying guys, I hav witnesses!
So then I suddenly realised that he must be bound by the 3 laws of robotics.
1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
Never seen him trying to harm anybody and stuff…tries to kill us during lectures by causing brain damage, but he does not consider students as human beings, animals instead.
2) A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
He obeys the orders given by ‘Humans’ according to his programming, the HOD, director,etc.
3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
His statement earlier for self defense is a clear indication that he tried to protect his existence.
Definitely a robot!